JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro

Bryn De Kocks | March 10, 2025

These headphones go tit-for-tat, each offering value.

The JBL Tune 770NC and Treblab Z7 Pro are two similar noise-canceling headphones available at between $100 and $150 from many leading retailers. I’ve tested both these speakers side by side to provide an accurate and in-depth comparison. Keep reading to find out whether the emerging Treblab brand can keep up with the pace of the industry-leading JBL.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Z7 Pros water resistance makes it better suited to outdoor exercise.
  • With a balanced sound and custom EQ, the Tune 770NC has more audio versatility.
  • The Z7 Pro has better codec support, but it doesn’t entirely translate.
  • JBL’s Tune 770NC offers outstanding battery performance.
Our Winner
JBL Tune 770NC
The JBL Tune 770NC edge out the Treblab Z7 Pro with its companion app and custom graphic EQ. Although the Z7 Pro is better-built, the versatility of the Tune 770NC makes it my top pick.

JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro

Model:JBL Tune 770NCTreblab Z7 Pro
Release Date:August 2023November 2021
Noise Control:Yes (ANC)Yes (ANC)
Bluetooth Version:5.35.0
Battery Life:Up to 70 hoursUp to 45 hours
Driver Size:40mm40mm
EQ:YesNo
Charging Port:USB-CUSB-C
App Support:YesNo
Weight:0.51 lbs0.54 lbs
Price:Check PriceCheck Price

Design, Comfort, & Durability Of The JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro

Summary: Water-resistance isn’t common in wireless ANC headphones, but that’s what the Z7 Pro offers. The Treblab Z7 Pro also has a better build with more comfort.

Design

Winner: Treblab Z7 Pro

JBL Tune 770NC

Treblab Z7 Pro

From an aesthetic standpoint, I find that the Treblab Z7 are a better looking pair of headphones. The JBL Tune 770NC are far from ugly, with the large JBL branding on the earcups being a little obnoxious. In contrast, the Z7 Pro is quite minimalistic in its design with only small, subtle branding on the headband.

However, with the Treblab Z7 Pro only being available in black, there are more color options to choose from if you go with the JBL Tune 770NC.

Durability

Winner: JBL Tune 770NC

JBL Tune 770NC

Treblab Z7 Pro

Treblab’s Z7 Pro feels distinctly more premium in the hand, although they’re only slightly heavier than plastic, feels distinctly thicker and ultimately more durable. The Tune 770NC’s plastic just feels like it’s more prone to damage over time.

With that said, the Z7 Pro has some areas that are at risk of damage over time. One area I’ve noticed is the outside of the earcup, where a layer of thin material covers. This can tear if the headphones are placed on something sharp, and even those with a habit of fidgeting will want to make sure they don’t dig their nails into the material without thinking.

The hinge joint on the Z7 Pro is especially satisfying. When rotated inward, it locks into a few positions, while still being very easy to adjust. There’s just something about the process that feels high-quality, with a bit of resistance on the hinge suggesting the mechanism is more complex.

Waterproofing

Winner: Tied

When testing the Treblab Z7 Pro, I was surprised by the fact that they have IPX4 water-resistance, a feature not commonly found on wireless ANC headphones. This feature gives it a significant advantage over the JBL Tune 770NC, which has no water protection.

This IPX4 rating means you can use the Z7 Pro in light drizzle without risking damage, or rest easy knowing that it’s also protected from the sweat build-up one has during exercise.

Comfort

Winner: Treblab Z7 Pro

JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro 3

Sony WH-CH720N (Left) and JBL Tune 770NC (Right)

Both of these headphones have some minor issues with comfort, depending on your ear size and shape. On one hand, I found that the JBL Tune 770NC had quite shallow earcups which allowed the material near the driver to push against my ear slightly.

The Treblab Z7 Pro performs better in this regard, but their earcups are narrower, which while suitable on my ears, can cause some discomfort for those with wider ear shapes.

The clamping force on both headphones is relatively similar and both give a sturdy fit that is suitable for mild to moderate exercise and don’t hurt the sides of the ears from excessive pressure. However, I find the Treblab Z7 Pro to be more comfortable overall. The headband padding on the Z7 Pro is also beneficial over the Tune 770NC, which has a narrow area of padding.

Portability

Winner: Tied

JBL Tune 770NC

Treblab Z7 Pro

When taking headphones out of the home, they must be easily portable. Both the Treblab and JBL achieve this by incorporating a swivel and collapsing earcup design that lets you fold them up and fit them into a backpack or sports bag. It’s effective and when folded up both headphones are of a similar size.

Controls, Connectivity & App Support Of The JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro

Summary: The Treblab Z7 Pro’s controls take a more modern approach, but have a steeper learning curve. Both headphones support wired connections, but the Z7 Pro’s 3.5mm to 3.5mm cable makes it easier to replace. There’s no app support for the Z7 Pro, but the JBL Tune 770NC’s companion app is excellent and adds custom EQ and additional features.

Wired Connections

Winner: Treblab Z7 Pro

Wireless headphones sometimes incorporate a physical cable port, for use at home, as to retain battery life. Both these headphones have this feature, but I prefer the Treblab Z7 Pro, as it uses a 1/8″ to 1/8″ cable, while the JBL Tune 770NC requires a 1/16″ to 1/8″ cable, making it a bit more challenging to find suitable replacement cables.

Both of the cables provided by the brands are relatively short, and not well suited for PC use. For better versatility, consider a longer aftermarket cable.

Bluetooth

Winner: Tied

With the JBL Tune having been released several years after the Z7 Pro, it’s not surprising that it offers better wireless connectivity. It supports Bluetooth 5.3, rather than the 5.0 on the Treblab. This translates to increased range, more reliable wireless connectivity. Although the Tune has more modern Bluetooth, it is worth noting that they only support the SBC codec, while the Z7 Pro supports aptX HD, a more advanced codec capable of higher bitrate.

To test the latency difference, I used an Android smartphone and played videos, looking for noticeable differences in visual and audio sync. I found that latency was minimal between both, and syncing wasn’t really a problem. The Z7 Pro seemed slightly better at achieving an accurate sync between video and audio.

Controls

Winner: JBL Tune 770NC

JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro 5

These two headphones have a distinctly different take on how their controls work. Although they share the same broad abilities in controlling the track, volume, and ANC setting, the JBL does this with an intuitive standard button layout.

The Z7 Pro, on the other hand, incorporates a mixture of buttons and touch controls. While the touch and gesture controls are cool, they are also a learning curve that one needs to deal with.

I prefer the straightforward approach of JBL, but also acknowledge that others may prefer the touch/gesture controls on the Treblab.

App Support

Winner: JBL Tune 770NC

Only the Tune 770NC has app support, meaning it’s also the only one between these two to allow for custom EQ. This is a big deal, and the lack of companion app from Treblab seems like a missed opportunity. In 2025, custom EQ has become near-mandatory, and with good reason. It is an easy and effective way of improving sound quality and tailoring the sound profile to the preference of the user.

Noise Canceling & Microphone Quality Of The JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro

Summary: The Z7 Pro has signifcantly better noise cancellation, especially in lower frequencies, but the JBL Tune 770NC has a distinctly better microphone, with more clarity.

Noise Canceling

Winner: Treblab Z7 Pro

When it comes to noise-canceling performance, the Treblab Z7 Pro outshines the Tune 770NC. They reduce almost all frequencies more effectively than the JBL, especially low droning sounds which are prevalent when using public transport. They also reduce more mid-range frequencies, which makes them more effective in an office environment too.

Microphone Quality

Winner: JBL Tune 770NC

The JBL Tune 770NC have better microphone quality, when I was testing these headphones I found that the Treblab’s mic wouldn’t effectively block out all the ambient noise. While the Tune 770NCs aren’t perfect either, they manage to isolate the voice better and offer a reasonable good recording quality.

Audio Performance Of The JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro

Summary: The Tune 770NC have a mostly balanced sound, which when combined with the custom EQ makes them extremely versatile and easy to dial in to one’s preferences. The Treblab Z7 Pro has a stronger bass though, which will appeal more to a lot of listeners.

Frequency Response / Sound Signature

Winner: JBL Tune 770NC

Despite a lot of similarities in features, these two headphones take a very different approach to their audio style. The Tune 770NC has a pretty balanced approach, which makes them versatile. Since they have a custom EQ option through the companion app, this more balanced approach gives a great starting point for adjustments.

In contrast, the lack of EQ on the Treblab means they’ve been designed to fit one of the more desired casual listening styles, a strong bass with elevated highs. The bass will be a selling point to those looking to maximize their boom, but it can be overpowering and lead to a lack in vocal presence. The spike in the treble creates some noticeable sibilance, which some individuals pick up on more than others.

Battery & Charging

Winner: JBL Tune 770NC

JBL Tune 770NC vs Treblab Z7 Pro 6

Both headphones have good battery life, but the JBL Tune 770NC is outstanding. I got close to 45 hours of playtime from a single charge, and 38 hours from the Treblab Z7 Pro. Both headphones will give days of use before charging is necessary, but keep in mind that ANC activation will influence the playtime.

They both use a USB-C port for charging, and although both are very fast charging, the JBL Tune 770NC is one of the fastest charging headphones I’ve tested, going from 0% to 100% in less than 2 hours.

Price & Value

The JBL Tune 770NC has a retail price of $129, and the Treblab Z7 Pro of $199. However, both are frequently marked down to around $100 to $130. The Z7 Pro is generally a little more expensive, owed most likely to the higher quality materials used.

Both offer excellent value for money, providing good quality sound, relatively good comfort and long lasting battery.

Conclusion

So which would I recommend buying? It ultimately comes down to what you want in your headphones. If style and durability are more important to you than a balanced sound, then the Treblab Z7 Pro is a better choice. However, if you are particular about how your headphones sound and want more control over the bass, mids, and treble – then the Tune 770NC’s companion app makes it the better choice.

Personally, I favor the simple controls of the JBL Tune and its more versatile sound. Still, it’s not an easy choice between the two.

Our Winner
JBL Tune 770NC
The JBL Tune 770NC edge out the Treblab Z7 Pro with its companion app and custom graphic EQ. Although the Z7 Pro is better-built, the versatility of the Tune 770NC makes it my top pick.
Did you find this content helpful?
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Did You Find This Content Helpful?
Photo of author

Author: Bryn De Kocks

Bryn has worked in the field for several years, writing in-depth speaker reviews for various audio publications. His work has historically focused on headphones and Bluetooth speakers, while incorporating his understanding of the Bluetooth speaker market to help educate potential buyers.

See All His Posts

Originally Published: March 10, 2025

Leave a Comment